# EXAMPLE — mac-m1-8gb — qwen3.5:0.8b — 2026-05-12 > **This is a synthetic example so contributors can see the shape of a > submission end-to-end. The numbers are plausible but not from a real run. > Don't cite this directory in analysis. Don't copy-paste these numbers. > Real submissions live alongside this folder under `submissions//`.** **Run ID:** `00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000` **Submitter:** EXAMPLE (synthetic) **Hardware:** Apple MacBook Air M1, 8 GB unified, macOS 14.5 **Runtime:** Ollama 0.5.13 (default settings; NUM_PARALLEL=1, KEEP_ALIVE=5m) **Models:** qwen3.5:0.8b **Phases run:** hello, 5q, 20q **Phases skipped:** parallel_same, parallel_mixed, edge_append, edge_suite — RAM constraint, parallel suites need ≥2 warm copies of the model and 8 GB unified didn't fit; edge suites time-budget skipped (would have been ~30 min more) ## Headline numbers | Cell | Phase | n_calls | tok/s mean | tok/s p50 | duration p50 | format_ok rate | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | mac-m1:ollama:qwen3.5:0.8b | hello | 1 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 1.8 s | n/a | | mac-m1:ollama:qwen3.5:0.8b | 5q | 5 | 21.4 | 22.3 | 4.2 s | 80% | | mac-m1:ollama:qwen3.5:0.8b | 20q | 20 | 17.0 | 20.9 | 9.6 s | 70% | ## What I observed (qualitative) - **Hello-call cold-start was fast** — 1.8 s including initial model load. Ollama reports the 0.8B GGUF as ~600 MB; on Apple Silicon unified memory this loads in well under 2 s. - **5Q tasks were uniformly handled** — all five formats (bash, python, shell, four-numbered-steps, json) parsed correctly except one (Q3, "shell_lines" — model started with `1.` numbered list instead of raw shell command). - **20Q tasks bifurcated** — the simple ones (Q01-Q08) ran at full ~20 tok/s with high format-correctness; the longer ones (Q09+ with multi-paragraph context) saw throughput drop to ~12-15 tok/s, with format_ok dropping to ~60%. p95 duration of 41 s was Q14 (the MyBoard triage prompt — long context, mixed format). - **No errors, no timeouts.** Cleanest run was on AC power; the laptop fan never spun up. ## Methodology Followed the canonical Pavilion methodology with these deviations: - **NUM_PARALLEL=1** instead of canonical 3 — laptop, not server; one slot is enough for sequential per-model-block execution. - **KEEP_ALIVE=5m** instead of canonical 2400h — laptop, no need to pin. - **Phases `parallel_same`, `parallel_mixed`, `edge_append`, `edge_suite` skipped** — see top of file. Run not eligible for `flagship` grade, intended as `standard`. ## Caveats - 8 GB unified RAM is below the comfort floor for parallel suites with this model; results above are NOT a refutation of the canonical parallel numbers — they're from a different shape of run. - macOS Spotlight indexing was disabled before the run started. If you rerun without disabling, expect ~5-10% additional variance from background I/O. - `format_ok` rate of 70% on 20Q is consistent with Sloba's flagship 20Q numbers for qwen3.5:0.8b on Pavilion (~74-78% in the v1 baseline) within measurement noise. ## Reproducibility ``` ollama pull qwen3.5:0.8b ollama serve # in a separate terminal python3 harness/run_benchmark.py \ --target-url http://127.0.0.1:11434 \ --models qwen3.5:0.8b \ --cell-id-prefix mac-m1:ollama \ --phases hello,5q,20q \ --submitter-handle alice \ --device-tag mac-m1-8gb ``` Took ~16 minutes wall-clock on this hardware. ## Privacy attestation I scanned `run.jsonl` for personal paths, API tokens, SSH keys, and home-directory leakage: ``` grep -nE "Bearer |sk-|api_key|/Users/|/home/|password|ssh-rsa|ssh-ed25519" \ submissions/EXAMPLE/mac-m1-8gb/run-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000/* ``` No matches outside the SSH-troubleshooting prompt in 5Q (Q3) which is intentional curriculum. Safe to ship. — EXAMPLE (synthetic; not a real contributor)